Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 11 of 11.

  1. Holzbau im Bestand
    Published: [2024]
    Publisher:  Detail Praxis, München

    Holz ist ein äußerst vielseitiger Baustoff. Durch den gekonnten Einsatz verschiedener Holzarten in geeigneten Bauweisen lassen sich nahezu alle Bauaufgaben realisieren. Insbesondere beim Bauen im Bestand kann Holz punkten. Es ist vergleichsweise... more

    Fachhochschule Dortmund, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    FH Münster, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    Holz ist ein äußerst vielseitiger Baustoff. Durch den gekonnten Einsatz verschiedener Holzarten in geeigneten Bauweisen lassen sich nahezu alle Bauaufgaben realisieren. Insbesondere beim Bauen im Bestand kann Holz punkten. Es ist vergleichsweise leicht und gut vorzufertigen und bietet eine positive Ökobilanz. Das Buch Holzbau im Bestand liefert das nötige Fachwissen, um alle Herausforderungen bei der nächsten Sanierungsaufgabe umzusetzen

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    ISBN: 9783955536220
    Series: DETAIL Praxis
    Subjects: Fassadenerweiterung; Holzkonstruktion im Bestand; Aufstockung; Erweiterung
    Other subjects: Verstehen; Gestaltung, Darstellung, Bautechnik; Hardcover, Softcover / Sachbücher/Kunst, Literatur/Architektur
    Scope: 112 Seiten, Illustrationen, 728 gr
  2. Foresight: A breath of fresh air on the East River
    the expansion of the UN Security Council triggers unexpected reforms
    Published: [July 2024]
    Publisher:  SWP, Berlin

    Surprise and jubilation in the United Nation Security Council (UNSC): 2028 begins with a bang. The permanent members of the body declare that they will voluntarily renounce their right of veto in cases of mass atrocities. This self-limitation,... more

    Access:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 386
    No inter-library loan

     

    Surprise and jubilation in the United Nation Security Council (UNSC): 2028 begins with a bang. The permanent members of the body declare that they will voluntarily renounce their right of veto in cases of mass atrocities. This self-limitation, achieved after a long struggle, would have been unthinkable without the far-reaching reform of the Security Council that preceded it. The initiative, based on an earlier Franco-Mexican proposal and the Code of Conduct of the Accountability, Coherence and Transparency Group (ACT Group), came from the new members of the enlarged UNSC. Since 2027, it has consisted of 27 instead of 15 members. Germany is among the new members. In her first speech after the enlargement, the German Ambassador to the UN noted with a wink that her country had hoped to be represented in 2027/28 even without the reform. After all, Berlin had already announced in 2023 that it would stand for election as a non-permanent member in 2027/28. However, it was not foreseeable at the time that Germany would now be one of the six new semi-permanent members of the Security Council.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/300617
    Series: SWP comment ; 2024, no. 26 (July 2024)
    Subjects: Szenario; Veto; Reform; Internationale Organisation; Entwicklung; Erweiterung; Mitgliedschaft; Reorganisation; Entscheidungsverfahren; UN Security Council (UNSC); UN reform; UN Charter; New 6 (N6); Japan; Brazil; India; South Africa and Nigeria; UN General Assembly (UNGA); Accountability; Coherence and Transparency Group (ACT Group); permanent five (P5); Ezulwini Consensus; Responsibility to Protect (R2P); China; Russia; France; Germany; Africa
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (7 Seiten), 1 Illustration
    Notes:

    "English version of a contribution to SWP-Studie 14/2024"

    Gesehen am 02.07.2024

  3. Acceding countries' gradual integration into the EU single market
    prerequisites, opportunities and hurdles
    Published: [September 2024]
    Publisher:  SWP, Berlin

    Since 25 June 2024, the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) have been engaging in accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova. The EU wants and needs to provide a strategic response to new geopolitical challenges, especially the Russian... more

    Access:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 386
    No inter-library loan

     

    Since 25 June 2024, the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) have been engaging in accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova. The EU wants and needs to provide a strategic response to new geopolitical challenges, especially the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine. At the same time, it intends to accelerate already tough negotiations with the countries of the Western Balkans. Indeed, new proposals are aiming to gradually integrate candidate and acceding countries into specific policy areas of the EU. Accession negotiations regularly focus on these countries' integra­tion into the highly regulated European single market, and thus their adoption of the EU's acquis communautaire with regard to the free movement of people, goods, services and capital. Whether the EU's offer of these country's gradual integration into the EU single market sparks momentum depends on how both sides weigh expected costs and benefits, and whether it is possible to develop concrete measures and timetables for implementation.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/304329
    Series: SWP comment ; 2024, no. 42 (September 2024)
    Subjects: Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Wirtschaftliche Integration; Verhandlung; Beitritt; Entwicklung; Tendenz; European Union (EU); accession negotiations; Ukraine; Albania; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Kosovo; Montenegro; North Macedonia; Serbia (WB-6); Russian war of aggression against Ukraine; acquis communautaire; free movement of people; goods; services and capital; Moldova; Georgia; cohesion; prosperity
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)
    Notes:

    "English version of SWP-Aktuell 45/2024"

    Gesehen am 16.09.2024

  4. Eine komplexe Aufgabe inmitten des Krieges
    Wiederaufbau und EU-Integration der Ukraine miteinander verzahnen
    Published: 2024
    Publisher:  German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) gGmbH, Bonn

    Die Ukraine und ihre internationalen Partner stehen vor einer gewaltigen Aufgabe: Nicht nur müssen sie den Wiederaufbau und den EU-Beitrittsprozess vorantreiben, sondern auch die Souveränität der Ukraine mithilfe militärischer und finanzieller... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bibliothek
    OA
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 396
    No inter-library loan

     

    Die Ukraine und ihre internationalen Partner stehen vor einer gewaltigen Aufgabe: Nicht nur müssen sie den Wiederaufbau und den EU-Beitrittsprozess vorantreiben, sondern auch die Souveränität der Ukraine mithilfe militärischer und finanzieller Unterstützung im Kampf gegen den russischen Angriff verteidigen. Die Ungewissheit über den Ausgang des Krieges macht die Planung für den Wiederaufbau und den EU-Beitritt umso komplexer, unterstreicht aber auch, dass beide Vorhaben Hand in Hand gehen und sich gegenseitig verstärken sollten. Zu diesem Zweck hat die EU die Ukraine-Fazilität beschlossen. Damit stellt die EU der Ukraine bis 2027 verlässliche Finanzmittel für den Wiederaufbau und wichtige Reformen bereit, die für einen EU-Beitritt erforderlich sind. Der zentrale Fahrplan für die Umsetzung der Fazilität ist der sogenannte Ukraine-Plan der ukrainischen Regierung. Den Wiederaufbau und den EU-Beitritt gleichzeitig zu stemmen, könnte die Kapazitäten der ukrainischen Regierung und des Privatsektors überlasten, wodurch der Rückhalt in der Gesellschaft schwinden könnte. Um beide Prozesse bestmöglich zu verzahnen, sollten Entscheidungsträger*innen folgende Empfehlungen berücksichtigen: ● Prioritäten für kurzfristige Hilfe mit langfristigen Ambitionen setzen. Wiederaufbaumaßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Sicherheitslage, zur Deckung der Grundbedürfnisse der Bevölkerung und zur Stabilisierung der ukrainischen Wirtschaft sollten Vorrang haben. Bei den EU-Beitrittsverhandlungen sollten grundlegende Beitrittsvoraussetzungen („fundamentals“) und die Verhandlungskapitel, die Wirtschaftswachstum und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit fördern, priorisiert werden. ● Für einen inklusiven Ansatz in der Umsetzung des Ukraine-Plans sorgen. Deutschland und die Ukraine, die im Juni 2024 gemeinsam die Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC) ausrichten werden, sollten sicherstellen, dass auf dieser ein inklusiver Ansatz zur Umsetzung des Ukraine-Plans entwickelt wird, der über die diesjährige URC hinaus trägt. Eine Möglichkeit ist die Bildung themenspezifischer Bündnisse ukrainischer Akteure auf unterschiedlichen Verwaltungsebenen. ● Internationale Geber für den Ukraine-Plan gewinnen und Wiederaufbaubemühungen als Hebel für einen beschleunigten EU-Beitritt nutzen. Deutschland könnte als EU- und G7-Mitglied als verbindendes Element zwischen den EU- und Nicht-EU-Akteuren fungieren, die sich für den Wiederaufbau der Ukraine einsetzen. Die EU-Mitgliedstaaten sollten ihre bilateralen Hilfen für die Ukraine auf den Ukraine-Plan abstimmen. ● Maßgeschneiderte technische Hilfe bereitstellen und Kapazitätsaufbau ausweiten. Ukrainische und internationale Akteure sollten gemeinsam eine „Asset Map“ erarbeiten, die Kapazitäten und ungenutztes Potenzial (z. B. in Bezug auf Infrastruktur, öffentliche Finanzen, Industrie und Handel) in bestimmten Regionen und Gemeinden sowie im Privatsektor erfasst und dabei die Entwicklungsstrategien der verschiedenen Verwaltungsebenen berücksichtigt. Die ukrainische Diaspora in den EU-Ländern sollte aktiv an diesen Prozessen beteiligt werden, jedoch ohne unrealistische Erwartungen hinsichtlich ihrer zeitnahen und vollständigen Rückkehr. ● Eine stufenweise EU-Integration der Ukraine vorbereiten. Die Bundesregierung sollte die europäische Debatte über mögliche Zwischenschritte auf dem Weg hin zur formellen EU-Mitgliedschaft weiter vorantreiben, wie etwa die schrittweise Integration der Ukraine in den EU-Binnenmarkt. ● Für eine offene und transparente Kommunikation sorgen. Aufbauend auf einem offenen und transparenten Dialog muss eine wirksame Kommunikationsstrategie gegenüber der ukrainischen Bevölkerung entwickelt werden, um deren Unterstützung für einen EU-Beitritt zu erhalten. Auch innerhalb der EU bedarf es einer effektiven Kommunikation, um den politischen Spielraum von Vetospielern einzugrenzen.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/297230
    Series: IDOS policy brief ; 2024, 16
    Subjects: Wiederaufbau; Kriegsfolge; Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Verhandlung; Beitritt; Kapitalhilfe; Zivilgesellschaft; Information; Kommunikation; Wirkung; Auswirkung; Krieg; Ukraine; Beziehungen Ukraine-EU; Wiederaufbau; EU-Beitritt; EU-Erweiterungspolitik
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 14 Seiten)
  5. Multiple missions in the midst of war
    integrating Ukraine's recovery and EU Accession
    Published: 2024
    Publisher:  German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) gGmbH, Bonn

    Ukraine and its international partners are faced with an unprecedented task: advancing recovery efforts and the EU accession process while also providing critically important military and financial support to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty... more

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bibliothek
    PB2024/11
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    Ukraine and its international partners are faced with an unprecedented task: advancing recovery efforts and the EU accession process while also providing critically important military and financial support to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty against Russian military aggression. Uncertainty over when and how the war will end makes planning for recovery and EU membership even more complex, but also underlines the need for their integration. Given a shared focus on a transformative modernisation, both processes can reinforce each other. Along this line of thinking, the EU has adopted the Ukraine Facility to provide reliable funding to Ukraine up to 2027, with the aim of supporting recovery and key institutional and administrative reforms required for Ukraine’s EU accession. The main roadmap for implementation of both is the Ukrainian government’s so-called Ukraine Plan. However, recovery and EU accession will not automatically create synergies, and may, at worst, overstretch Ukrainian government and private-sector capacities as well as societal support. To maximise synergies between the processes, policymakers should consider the following recommendations: ● Set priorities that address short-term demands and have long-term ambitions. Recovery measures should be prioritised that improve security, meet the basic needs of the people and are crucial to the functioning of the Ukrainian economy. In EU accession negotiations, the “fundamentals” and chapters that stimulate economic growth and competitiveness should be prioritised, because utilising the accession process to stimulate economic growth today can directly contribute to transformative rebuilding and vice versa. ● Ensure society-wide ownership of the Ukraine Plan. The German and Ukrainian governments, as co-hosts of the Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC) in June 2024, should make sure that the URC is the starting point for institutionalising an inclusive approach in the implementation of the Ukraine Plan. This can be achieved through the promotion of issue-specific coalitions of different actors across multiple levels of governance in Ukraine beyond this year’s URC. ● Engage international donors in supporting the Ukraine Plan and leveraging recovery to accelerate Ukraine’s EU accession path. Germany, as an EU and G7 member state, could serve as an important bridge-builder between EU and non-EU supporters of Ukraine’s recovery. EU member states should align their bilateral assistance to Ukraine with the Ukraine Plan. ● Tailor technical assistance and capacity building. An asset map, developed jointly by Ukrainian and international actors, should identify and systematise strengths and unused potential (e.g. regarding infrastructure, public finance and industrial and commercial activities) in specific regions and municipalities, and in the private sector, taking into account the different development strategies that have evolved at different levels of governance over the past months. The Ukrainian diaspora in EU countries should be incentivised to actively engage in these processes without predicating their involvement on unrealistic expectations of a quick and large-scale return. ● Prepare for intermediate steps in Ukraine’s EU accession. The German government should continue to advance the debate between EU institutions and member states about intermediate steps in Ukraine’s EU accession before formal membership, including Ukraine’s progressive integration into the EU single market. ● Adopt open and transparent communication. Building on open and transparent dialogue, both the Ukrainian government and the EU will need to develop an effective communication strategy towards the Ukrainian people to uphold their support for EU accession. Effective communication within the EU is required to limit the political space of veto players.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    Series: IDOS policy brief ; 2024, 11
    Subjects: Wiederaufbau; Kriegsfolge; Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Verhandlung; Beitritt; Kapitalhilfe; Zivilgesellschaft; Information; Kommunikation; Wirkung; Auswirkung; Krieg
    Scope: 11 Seiten
  6. EU enlargement: geopolitics meets integration policy
    the EU is set to add gradualist elements to its enlargement doctrine
    Published: [January 2024]
    Publisher:  SWP, Berlin

    Now that the European Council has given the green light to opening EU accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, it is clear that the Union is no longer simply showing symbolic solidarity with neighbours invaded or threatened by Russia. Rather,... more

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 386
    No inter-library loan

     

    Now that the European Council has given the green light to opening EU accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, it is clear that the Union is no longer simply showing symbolic solidarity with neighbours invaded or threatened by Russia. Rather, a new chapter of enlargement policy is beginning in the shadow of war. After Turkey and the six Western Balkan countries, the third enlargement area is formed by Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia in Eastern Europe. Ever since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Brussels has understood enlargement to mean expansion into strategically important regions. Geopolitical demands for rapid accession are gnawing away at the existing enlargement doctrine, according to which there can be neither compromises on the Copenhagen criteria for EU membership nor shortcuts along the path to acces­sion. What is more, accession issues could soon enter the perilous waters of war diplomacy when lasting security for post-war Ukraine is at stake. In a bid to overcome the dilemma between geopolitics and integration policy, the European Commission is currently developing ideas about how new members can be integrated step by step.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/283044
    Series: SWP comment ; 2024, no. 1 (January 2024)
    Subjects: Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Integration <Internationale Politik>; Geopolitik; Verhandlung; Beitritt; European Council; European Commission; European Union; EU accession negotiations; Ukraine; Moldova; Georgia; Bosnia-Herzegovina; Russia
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)
    Notes:

    "Updated English version of SWP-Aktuell 63/2023"

    Gesehen am 11.01.2024

  7. The state of consensus in the EU
    what is the way forward in the debate about expanding qualified majority decisions?
    Published: [April 2024]
    Publisher:  SWP, Berlin

    The debate in the European Union (EU) on the expansion of majority decision-making is entering a new round. Germany, in particular, is seeking to build a coalition in favour of more majority decisions in light of the, at times, difficult... more

    Access:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 386
    No inter-library loan

     

    The debate in the European Union (EU) on the expansion of majority decision-making is entering a new round. Germany, in particular, is seeking to build a coalition in favour of more majority decisions in light of the, at times, difficult decision-making process concerning foreign and security policy, and the prospect of future EU enlargement. Too often, however, this debate is not taking into account how and with what results majority decisions are being used in other, sometimes equally contested policy areas. An analysis of the public votes since 2010 compiled in the SWP’s new EU Council Monitor shows that EU member states generally strive for consensus, even in majority decisions. Larger groups of member states are almost never outvoted. Still, Hungary and Poland increasingly stand out as two states that are outvoted more often than others, albeit to a slightly lesser degree than the United Kingdom (UK) was before Brexit. One way out of the dilemma between strengthening the EU’s ability to act and protecting vital national interests could be a well-balanced "sovereignty safety net".

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/297221
    Series: SWP comment ; 2024, no. 16 (April 2024)
    Subjects: Internationale Organisation; Entscheidungsprozess; Entscheidungsverfahren; Mehrheitsprinzip; Intensivierung; Erhöhung; Erweiterung; Mitgliedsstaaten; Wahlverhalten; Nationales Interesse; Politische Reform; European Union (EU); majority decision-making; qualified majority voting (QMV); EU enlargement; public votes; "sovereignty safety net"
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten), Illustrationen
    Notes:

    "English version of SWP-Aktuell 24/2024"

    Gesehen am 19.04.2024

  8. Multiple missions in the midst of war
    integrating Ukraine's recovery and EU Accession
    Published: 2024
    Publisher:  German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) gGmbH, Bonn

    Ukraine and its international partners are faced with an unprecedented task: advancing recovery efforts and the EU accession process while also providing critically important military and financial support to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bibliothek
    OA
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 396
    No inter-library loan

     

    Ukraine and its international partners are faced with an unprecedented task: advancing recovery efforts and the EU accession process while also providing critically important military and financial support to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty against Russian military aggression. Uncertainty over when and how the war will end makes planning for recovery and EU membership even more complex, but also underlines the need for their integration. Given a shared focus on a transformative modernisation, both processes can reinforce each other. Along this line of thinking, the EU has adopted the Ukraine Facility to provide reliable funding to Ukraine up to 2027, with the aim of supporting recovery and key institutional and administrative reforms required for Ukraine's EU accession. The main roadmap for implementation of both is the Ukrainian government's so-called Ukraine Plan. However, recovery and EU accession will not automatically create synergies, and may, at worst, overstretch Ukrainian government and private-sector capacities as well as societal support. To maximise synergies between the processes, policymakers should consider the following recommendations: ● Set priorities that address short-term demands and have long-term ambitions. Recovery measures should be prioritised that improve security, meet the basic needs of the people and are crucial to the functioning of the Ukrainian economy. In EU accession negotiations, the "fundamentals" and chapters that stimulate economic growth and competitiveness should be prioritised, because utilising the accession process to stimulate economic growth today can directly contribute to transformative rebuilding and vice versa. ● Ensure society-wide ownership of the Ukraine Plan. The German and Ukrainian governments, as co-hosts of the Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC) in June 2024, should make sure that the URC is the starting point for institutionalising an inclusive approach in the implementation of the Ukraine Plan. This can be achieved through the promotion of issue-specific coalitions of different actors across multiple levels of governance in Ukraine beyond this year's URC. ● Engage international donors in supporting the Ukraine Plan and leveraging recovery to accelerate Ukraine's EU accession path. Germany, as an EU and G7 member state, could serve as an important bridge-builder between EU and non-EU supporters of Ukraine's recovery. EU member states should align their bilateral assistance to Ukraine with the Ukraine Plan. ● Tailor technical assistance and capacity building. An asset map, developed jointly by Ukrainian and international actors, should identify and systematise strengths and unused potential (e.g. regarding infrastructure, public finance and industrial and commercial activities) in specific regions and municipalities, and in the private sector, taking into account the different development strategies that have evolved at different levels of governance over the past months. The Ukrainian diaspora in EU countries should be incentivised to actively engage in these processes without predicating their involvement on unrealistic expectations of a quick and large-scale return. ● Prepare for intermediate steps in Ukraine's EU accession. The German government should continue to advance the debate between EU institutions and member states about intermediate steps in Ukraine's EU accession before formal membership, including Ukraine's progressive integration into the EU single market. ● Adopt open and transparent communication. Building on open and transparent dialogue, both the Ukrainian government and the EU will need to develop an effective communication strategy towards the Ukrainian people to uphold their support for EU accession. Effective communication within the EU is required to limit the political space of veto players.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/294866
    Series: IDOS policy brief ; 2024, 11
    Subjects: Wiederaufbau; Kriegsfolge; Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Verhandlung; Beitritt; Kapitalhilfe; Zivilgesellschaft; Information; Kommunikation; Wirkung; Auswirkung; Krieg; Ukraine; Ukraine-EU relations; recovery; reconstruction; EU accession; EU enlargement policy
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 12 Seiten)
  9. Multiple missions in the midst of war
    integrating Ukraine’s recovery and EU Accession = Multiple missions in the midst of war : integrating Ukraine’s recovery and EU Accession
    Published: 2024
    Publisher:  German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) gGmbH, Bonn

    Перед Україною та її міжнародними партнерами постало безпрецедентне завдання: рухатися вперед в процесах відновлення та вступу до ЄС, а також забезпечувати критично важливу військову та фінансову підтримку, щоб допомогти Україні захистити свій... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bibliothek
    OA
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSP 396
    No inter-library loan

     

    Перед Україною та її міжнародними партнерами постало безпрецедентне завдання: рухатися вперед в процесах відновлення та вступу до ЄС, а також забезпечувати критично важливу військову та фінансову підтримку, щоб допомогти Україні захистити свій суверенітет від російської військової агресії. Невизначеність щодо того, коли і як закінчиться війна, ще більше ускладнює планування щодо відновлення та членства в ЄС, проте також підкреслює необхідність їх інтеграції. Беручи до уваги спільну спрямованість на трансформаційну модернізацію, обидва процеси можуть взаємопідсилюватись. Виходячи з цього, ЄС затвердив Ukraine Facility для забезпечення надійного фінансування України до 2027 року з метою підтримки відновлення та ключових інституційних і адміністративних реформ, необхідних для вступу України до ЄС. Основою реалізації обох напрямків є так званий План України українського Уряду. Однак, відновлення і вступ до ЄС не призведуть до автоматичної синергії, в гіршому випадку вони можуть надмірно перенапружити спроможність українського Уряду і приватного сектору, а також підтримку громадськості. Щоб доcягти максимальної синергії між цими процесами, політичним діячам слід взяти до уваги такі рекомендації: ● Встановлення пріоритетів, які відповідаютькороткостроковим вимогам та мають довгостроковіамбіції. Пріоритетними повинні бути заходи звідновлення, які підвищують безпеку, забезпечуютьосновні потреби людей і мають вирішальне значення дляукраїнської економіки. У рамках переговорів про вступ доЄС пріоритетними повинні бути «основні принципи» ірозділи, що стимулюють економічне зростання іконкурентоспроможність, оскільки використання процесувступу для стимулювання економічного зростаннясьогодні може безпосередньо сприяти трансформаційнійперебудові, і навпаки. ● Забезпечення участі суспільства в реалізації ПлануУкраїни. Уряди Німеччини та України, якспіворганізатори Конференції з відновлення України (URC) у червні 2024 року, повинні переконатися, що URC є відправною точкою для інституціоналізації інклюзивного підходу до реалізації Плану України. Цього можна досягти шляхом створення коаліцій різноманітних учасників на багатьох рівнях управління в Україні, орієнтованих на вирішення конкретних проблем поза межами цьогорічної Конференції URC. ● Залучення міжнародних донорів до підтримки Плану України, відновлення та вступу України до ЄС.Німеччина, як держава-член ЄС і G7, може стативажливою ланкою між прихильниками відновленняУкраїни з ЄС та країнами, що не входять в ЄС. Держави-члени ЄС повинні привести свою двосторонню допомогуУкраїні у відповідність з Планом України.● Розробка спеціальної технічної допомоги та розбудова потенціалу. Карта активів, розробленаспільно українськими та міжнародними учасниками, повинна виявляти і систематизувати сильні сторони таневикористаний потенціал (наприклад, щодоінфраструктури, державного фінансування, промисловоїта комерційної діяльності) у конкретних регіонах,муніципалітетах та у приватному секторі, беручи до увагистратегії розвитку, які розроблялися на різних рівнях управляння протягом останніх місяців. Heобхідним єзалучення української діаспори в країнах ЄС до участі в цих процесах, не обумовлюючи це нереалістичнимиочікуваннями щодо швидкого і масштабного повернення. ● Підготовка проміжних кроків на шляху вступуУкраїни до ЄС. Уряду Німеччини слід продовжуватипросувати дискусію між інституціями ЄС і державами-членами про проміжні кроки щодо поступового вступуУкраїни в ЄС перед офіційнім вступом, включаючиінтеграцію України в єдиний ринок ЄС. ● Застосування відкритої та прозорої комунікації.Спираючись на відкритий і прозорий діалог УрядуУкраїни та ЄС, необхідно розробити стратегію комунікаціїз українським народом, щоб заручитися його підтримкоющодо вступу до ЄС. Ефективна комунікація всередині ЄСнеобхідна для обмеження по.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: Ukrainian
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/297226
    Series: IDOS policy brief ; 2024,14
    Subjects: Wiederaufbau; Kriegsfolge; Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Verhandlung; Beitritt; Kapitalhilfe; Zivilgesellschaft; Information; Kommunikation; Wirkung; Auswirkung; Krieg; Ukraine; Ukraine-EU relations; recovery; reconstruction; EU accession; EU enlargement policy
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 14 Seiten)
  10. Holzbau im Bestand
    Published: [2024]
    Publisher:  Detail Business Information GmbH, München

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    ISBN: 9783955536220; 395553622X
    Other identifier:
    9783955536220
    Edition: Erste Auflage
    Series: DETAIL Praxis
    Subjects: Bauen im Bestand; Erweiterungsbau; Holzkonstruktion; Bauökologie
    Other subjects: (Produktform)Hardback; Fassadenerweiterung; Holzkonstruktion im Bestand; Aufstockung; Erweiterung; (VLB-WN)1955: Hardcover, Softcover / Sachbücher/Kunst, Literatur/Architektur; (BISAC Subject Heading)ARC009000: ARC009000 ARCHITECTURE / Methods & Materials
    Scope: 112 Seiten, Illustrationen, 31 cm
  11. Acceding countries' gradual integration into the EU single market
    prerequisites, opportunities and hurdles
    Published: [September 2024]
    Publisher:  SWP, Berlin

    Zusammenfassung: Since 25 June 2024, the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) have been engaging in accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova. The EU wants and needs to provide a strategic response to new geopolitical challenges,... more

     

    Zusammenfassung: Since 25 June 2024, the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) have been engaging in accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova. The EU wants and needs to provide a strategic response to new geopolitical challenges, especially the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine. At the same time, it intends to accelerate already tough negotiations with the countries of the Western Balkans. Indeed, new proposals are aiming to gradually integrate candidate and acceding countries into specific policy areas of the EU. Accession negotiations regularly focus on these countries' integra­tion into the highly regulated European single market, and thus their adoption of the EU's acquis communautaire with regard to the free movement of people, goods, services and capital. Whether the EU's offer of these country's gradual integration into the EU single market sparks momentum depends on how both sides weigh expected costs and benefits, and whether it is possible to develop concrete measures and timetables for implementation

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    Series: SWP comment ; 2024, no. 42 (September 2024)
    SWP comment ; 2024, no. 42 (September 2024)
    Subjects: Internationale Organisation; Erweiterung; Wirtschaftliche Integration; Verhandlung; Beitritt; Entwicklung; Tendenz
    Other subjects: European Union (EU); accession negotiations; Ukraine; Moldova; Albania; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Kosovo; Montenegro; North Macedonia; Serbia (WB-6); Russian war of aggression against Ukraine; acquis communautaire; free movement of people; goods; services and capital; Moldova; Georgia; cohesion; prosperity; Graue Literatur
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)
    Notes:

    "English version of SWP-Aktuell 45/2024"

    Gesehen am 16.09.2024