Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Filtern nach
Aktive Filter
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

  1. What Roe v. Wade should have said
    the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision
    Autor*in: Allen, Anita L.; Amar, Akhil Reed
    Erschienen: [2023]; 2023; © 2023
    Verlag:  New York University Press, New York ; Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin

    A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (lizenzpflichtig)
    Verlag (lizenzpflichtig)

    Standort:
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek - Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Bundesverfassungsgericht, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    Online-Ressource
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Bibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it—and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Balkin, Jack M. (HerausgeberIn, VerfasserIn)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781479824465
    Weitere Identifier:
    Auflage/Ausgabe: Revised edition
    Schriftenreihe: De Gruyter eBook-Paket Rechtswissenschaften
    Schlagworte: Abortion; Trials (Abortion); LAW / Legal History
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (XIV, 323 Seiten), Illustrationen