Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 7 von 7.

  1. Afterword: Future Directions in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural (3MC) Survey Research
    Autor*in: de Jong, Julie; Cibelli Hibben, Kristen; Kelley, Jennifer; Behr, Dorothée
    Erschienen: 2020
    Verlag:  SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V., Mannheim ; RTI Press, Research Triangle Park, NC

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Sha, Mandy (Herausgeber); Gabel, Tim (Herausgeber)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Schriftenreihe: The essential role of language in survey research
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Sprache; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)Forschung; (thesoz)Methode; (thesoz)vergleichende Forschung; (thesoz)Befragung; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Fragebogen; (thesoz)Übersetzung; (thesoz)Pretest; (thesoz)Interview; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Datenqualität; (thesoz)Sprachbarriere; (thesoz)Mehrsprachigkeit; (thesoz)Transkulturalität
    Umfang: Online-Ressource, 243-256 S.
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Sha, Mandy (Hg.), Gabel, Tim (Hg.): The essential role of language in survey research. 2020. S. 243-256. ISBN 978-1-934831-23-6
  2. A Comparison of Results from a Spanish and English Mail Survey: Effects of Instruction Placement on Item Missingness
    Autor*in: Wang, Kevin; Sha, Mandy M.
    Erschienen: 2013

    Abstract: Few research studies compare results from self-administered bilingual paper questionnaires on how the positioning of skip instructions may affect the respondent’s ability to follow skip patterns. Using data from the 2004 and 2005 of the... mehr

     

    Abstract: Few research studies compare results from self-administered bilingual paper questionnaires on how the positioning of skip instructions may affect the respondent’s ability to follow skip patterns. Using data from the 2004 and 2005 of the Phase 5 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) mail survey questionnaire, this paper attempts to fill this gap. We examined whether the positioning of skip instructions can produce differences in item nonresponse rates in subsequent items and how results compare between English and Spanish language questionnaires. These results will be of interest to designers of bilingual self-administered survey questionnaires in guiding respondents through the intended navigational path with skip patterns

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/33767
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Fragebogen; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)postalische Befragung; (thesoz)englische Sprache; (thesoz)spanische Sprache; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Mehrsprachigkeit; (thesoz)Erhebungsmethode
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (2013) ; 13
  3. Exploring Language Effects in Crosscultural Survey Research: Does the Language of Administration Affect Answers About Politics?
    Autor*in: Zavala-Rojas, Diana

    Abstract: We study if the language of administration of a survey has an effect on the answers of bilingual respondents to questions measuring political dimensions. This is done in two steps. In the first we test whether the measurement instruments... mehr

     

    Abstract: We study if the language of administration of a survey has an effect on the answers of bilingual respondents to questions measuring political dimensions. This is done in two steps. In the first we test whether the measurement instruments are equivalent for the same individual in two languages. After measurement invariance is established, we test if latent mean differences are significant across the two languages. We also test if the correlation of the same concept in two languages is equal to one or not. Results show evidence for language effects, the latent correlation is below one, although mean differences are not significant. We use data of the LISS migration panel in a within subject design, respondents answer a questionnaire twice first in Dutch and then in their (second) native language among Arabic, English, German, Papiamento and Turkish

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/56027
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Veröffentlichungsversion
    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
    Enthalten in: Methods, data, analyses; Mannheim : GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2014-; 12, Heft 1 (2018), 127-150; Online-Ressource
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)interkultureller Vergleich; (thesoz)Mehrsprachigkeit; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Meinungsforschung; (thesoz)politische Meinung; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Korrelation; language effects; bilingualism; measurement equivalence
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
  4. Respondents' ratings of expressions from response scales: a two-country, two-language investigation on equivalence and translation
    Autor*in: Mohler, Peter Ph; Smith, Tom W.; Harkness, Janet
    Erschienen: 1998

    Abstract: "The paper presents German-American research on expressions from response scales used in cross-national and cross-lingual survey research. Respondents in the United States and Germany were asked to rate expression for the degrees of... mehr

     

    Abstract: "The paper presents German-American research on expressions from response scales used in cross-national and cross-lingual survey research. Respondents in the United States and Germany were asked to rate expression for the degrees of intensity they were held to express. The scales used were scales of agreement, importance and for/against. The findings of the study raise as many questions as they answer. Translation-based pairings of expressions across English and German work well but not perfectly. Symmetrical response scales often lead to artificial-sounding 'scalespeak' constructions: their effect on scale responses is unknown. Well-matched translation pairings were sometimes differently scored across the populations. Germans and Americans differed in the range of scale points they employed and in the range of vocabulary used to 'explain' expressions. The study is seen as a first step towards understanding cross-national response scale issues." (author's abstract)

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Harkness, Janet (Herausgeber)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/49736
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Schriftenreihe: Cross-cultural survey equivalence ; Bd. 3
    ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; Bd. 3
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Bundesrepublik Deutschland; (thesoz)englische Sprache; (thesoz)Übersetzung; (thesoz)Nordamerika; (thesoz)Skalenkonstruktion; (thesoz)deutsche Sprache; (thesoz)Fragebogen; (thesoz)empirische Sozialforschung; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Befragung; (thesoz)Sprachgebrauch; (thesoz)USA; (thesoz)Erhebungsmethode
    Umfang: Online-Ressource, 159-184 S.
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet

    In: Harkness, Janet (Hg.): Cross-cultural survey equivalence. 1998. S. 159-184. ISBN 3-924220-13-1
  5. Now, later, or never? Using response-time patterns to predict panel attrition
    Autor*in: Minderop, Isabella; Weiß, Bernd
    Erschienen: 2022
    Verlag:  SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V., Mannheim

    Abstract: Preventing panel members from attriting is a fundamental challenge for panel surveys. Research has shown that response behavior in earlier waves (response or nonresponse) is a good predictor of panelists' response behavior in upcoming... mehr

     

    Abstract: Preventing panel members from attriting is a fundamental challenge for panel surveys. Research has shown that response behavior in earlier waves (response or nonresponse) is a good predictor of panelists' response behavior in upcoming waves. However, response behavior can be described in greater detail by considering the time until the response is returned. In the present study, we investigated whether respondents who habitually return their survey late and respondents who switch between early and late response in multiple waves are more likely to attrit from a panel. Using data from the GESIS Panel, we found that later response is related to a higher likelihood of attrition (AME = 0.087) and that response-time stability is related to a lower likelihood of attrition (AME = −0.013). Our models predicted most cases of attrition; thus, survey practitioners could potentially predict future attriters by applying these models to their own data

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Prognose; (thesoz)Befragung; (thesoz)Datenqualität; (thesoz)Panel; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; Reluctant response; panel survey; paradata; late response; ZA5664: GESIS Panel - Extended Edition (Datenfile Version 26.0.0)
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology (2022) ; 1-14
  6. Risk of Nonresponse Bias and the Length of the Field Period in a Mixed-Mode General Population Panel
    Autor*in: Struminskaya, Bella; Gummer, Tobias
    Erschienen: 2021
    Verlag:  SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V., Mannheim

    Abstract: Survey researchers are often confronted with the question of how long to set the length of the field period. Longer fielding time might lead to greater participation yet requires survey managers to devote more of their time to data... mehr

     

    Abstract: Survey researchers are often confronted with the question of how long to set the length of the field period. Longer fielding time might lead to greater participation yet requires survey managers to devote more of their time to data collection efforts. With the aim of facilitating the decision about the length of the field period, we investigated whether a longer fielding time reduces the risk of nonresponse bias to judge whether field periods can be ended earlier without endangering the performance of the survey. By using data from six waves of a probability-based mixed-mode (online and mail) panel of the German population, we analyzed whether the risk of nonresponse bias decreases over the field period by investigating how day-by-day coefficients of variation develop during the field period. We then determined the optimal cut-off points for each mode after which data collection can be terminated without increasing the risk of nonresponse bias and found that the optimal cut-off poi

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)Befragung; (thesoz)Online-Befragung; (thesoz)postalische Befragung; (thesoz)Panel; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; Coefficient of variation; Field duration; Mixed-mode panels; Nonresponse bias; Response propensity; ZA5665: GESIS Panel—Standard Edition, Version 19.0.0, 2017-4-18 Release 19, doi:10.4232/1.12743
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology ; 10 (2021) 1 ; 161-182
  7. Methodological Aspects of a Quantitative and Qualitative Survey of Asylum Seekers in Germany - A Field Report
    Autor*in: Haug, Sonja; Lochner, Susanne; Huber, Dominik

    Abstract: This field report presents and discusses methodological issues and challenges encountered in a mixed-methods research project on asylum seekers in Bavaria, Germany. It documents the research design of, and field experiences in, a... mehr

     

    Abstract: This field report presents and discusses methodological issues and challenges encountered in a mixed-methods research project on asylum seekers in Bavaria, Germany. It documents the research design of, and field experiences in, a quantitative survey based on a quota sampling procedure and a qualitative study, both of which were conducted in collective accommodation for asylum seekers at selected locations in that federal state. Standardized PAPI multiple-topic questionnaires were completed by asylum seekers from Syria, Afghanistan, Eritrea, and Iraq (N = 779); most of the questionnaires were self-administered. In addition, 12 qualitative face-to-face biographical interviews were conducted in order to gain an indepth understanding of attitudes and experiences of asylum seekers. This report focuses on the following aspects: the use of gatekeepers to facilitate participant recruitment; sampling procedures; the involvement of interpreters in the data collection process; response bias a

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/63139
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Veröffentlichungsversion
    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
    Enthalten in: Methods, data, analyses; Mannheim : GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2014-; 13, Heft 2 (2019), 321-340; Online-Ressource
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Asylbewerber; (thesoz)Bayern; (thesoz)Bundesrepublik Deutschland; (thesoz)Befragung; (thesoz)Interview; (thesoz)Einstellung; (thesoz)Flucht; (thesoz)Motiv; (thesoz)Wertorientierung; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; mixed methods; surveys; biographical research; gatekeeper approach; methodological issues; use of interpreters
    Umfang: Online-Ressource