Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Filtern nach
Aktive Filter
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 2 von 2.

  1. Legal Orientalism
    China, the United States, and Modern Law
    Autor*in: Ruskola, Teemu
    Erschienen: [2013]
    Verlag:  Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Standort:
    Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus - Senftenberg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Link zum Verbundkatalog:
    Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg (KOBV)
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780674075764
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schlagworte: Law / China / Philosophy / History; Rule of law / China / History; Rule of law / China / Public opinion; Sociological jurisprudence / China; Law / United States / Philosophy / History; Rule of law / United States / History; Rule of law / United States / Public opinion; LAW / Essays; LAW / General Practice; LAW / Jurisprudence; LAW / Paralegals Paralegalism; LAW / Practical Guides; LAW / Reference; HISTORY / United States / 20th Century; Law / Philosophy; Rule of law / Public opinion; Geschichte; Philosophie; Recht; Recht; Orientalism; Public opinion, Western; Rule of law; Sociological jurisprudence; Recht <Motiv>; Chinabild; Rechtsphilosophie
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (352p.)
    Bemerkung(en):

    4 halftones

    After the Cold War, how did China become a global symbol of disregard for human rights, while the U.S. positioned itself as the chief exporter of the rule of law? Teemu Ruskola investigates globally circulating narratives about what law is and who has it, and shows how "legal Orientalism" developed into a distinctly American ideology of empire

    Since the Cold War ended, China has become a global symbol of disregard for human rights, while the United States has positioned itself as the world’s chief exporter of the rule of law. How did lawlessness become an axiom about Chineseness rather than a fact needing to be verified empirically, and how did the United States assume the mantle of law’s universal appeal? In a series of wide-ranging inquiries, Teemu Ruskola investigates the history of "legal Orientalism": a set of globally circulating narratives about what law is and who has it. For example, why is China said not to have a history of corporate law, as a way of explaining its "failure" to develop capitalism on its own? Ruskola shows how a European tradition of philosophical prejudices about Chinese law developed into a distinctively American ideology of empire, influential to this day. The first Sino-U.S. treaty in 1844 authorized the extraterritorial application of American law in a putatively lawless China. A kind of legal imperialism, this practice long predated U.S. territorial colonialism after the Spanish-American War in 1898, and found its fullest expression in an American district court’s jurisdiction over the "District of China." With urgent contemporary implications, legal Orientalism lives on in the enduring damage wrought on the U.S. Constitution by late nineteenth-century anti-Chinese immigration laws, and in the self-Orientalizing reforms of Chinese law today. In the global politics of trade and human rights, legal Orientalism continues to shape modern subjectivities, institutions, and geopolitics in powerful and unacknowledged ways
  2. Legal Orientalism
    China, the United States, and Modern Law
    Autor*in: Ruskola, Teemu
    Erschienen: [2013]
    Verlag:  Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Standort:
    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden / Hochschulbibliothek Amberg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    TH-AB - Technische Hochschule Aschaffenburg, Hochschulbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Technische Hochschule Augsburg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschule Coburg, Zentralbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschule Kempten, Hochschulbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschule Landshut, Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Bibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Passau
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780674075764
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schlagworte: Law / China / Philosophy / History; Rule of law / China / History; Rule of law / China / Public opinion; Sociological jurisprudence / China; Law / United States / Philosophy / History; Rule of law / United States / History; Rule of law / United States / Public opinion; LAW / Essays; LAW / General Practice; LAW / Jurisprudence; LAW / Paralegals Paralegalism; LAW / Practical Guides; LAW / Reference; HISTORY / United States / 20th Century; Law / Philosophy; Rule of law / Public opinion; Geschichte; Philosophie; Recht; Recht; Orientalism; Public opinion, Western; Rule of law; Sociological jurisprudence; Recht <Motiv>; Chinabild; Rechtsphilosophie
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (352p.)
    Bemerkung(en):

    4 halftones

    After the Cold War, how did China become a global symbol of disregard for human rights, while the U.S. positioned itself as the chief exporter of the rule of law? Teemu Ruskola investigates globally circulating narratives about what law is and who has it, and shows how "legal Orientalism" developed into a distinctly American ideology of empire

    Since the Cold War ended, China has become a global symbol of disregard for human rights, while the United States has positioned itself as the world’s chief exporter of the rule of law. How did lawlessness become an axiom about Chineseness rather than a fact needing to be verified empirically, and how did the United States assume the mantle of law’s universal appeal? In a series of wide-ranging inquiries, Teemu Ruskola investigates the history of "legal Orientalism": a set of globally circulating narratives about what law is and who has it. For example, why is China said not to have a history of corporate law, as a way of explaining its "failure" to develop capitalism on its own? Ruskola shows how a European tradition of philosophical prejudices about Chinese law developed into a distinctively American ideology of empire, influential to this day. The first Sino-U.S. treaty in 1844 authorized the extraterritorial application of American law in a putatively lawless China. A kind of legal imperialism, this practice long predated U.S. territorial colonialism after the Spanish-American War in 1898, and found its fullest expression in an American district court’s jurisdiction over the "District of China." With urgent contemporary implications, legal Orientalism lives on in the enduring damage wrought on the U.S. Constitution by late nineteenth-century anti-Chinese immigration laws, and in the self-Orientalizing reforms of Chinese law today. In the global politics of trade and human rights, legal Orientalism continues to shape modern subjectivities, institutions, and geopolitics in powerful and unacknowledged ways