Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Narrow Search
Search narrowed by
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 2 of 2.

  1. Analysis of monthly CO2 emission trends for major EU Countries
    a time series approach
    Author: Quatrosi, Marco
    Published: September 2020
    Publisher:  SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, [Ferrara, Italy]

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) / Leibniz-Informationszentrum Technik und Naturwissenschaften und Universitätsbibliothek
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signature:
    VS 716
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Series: Working paper series / SEEDS ; 2020, 15
    Subjects: emissions; energy consumption; CO2; energy mix; energy transition; emission factors; time series
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 25 Seiten), Illustrationen
  2. Refunding emission payments
    output-based versus expenditure-based refunding
    Author: Hagem, Cathrine; Hoel, Michael Olaf; Sterner, Thomas
    Published: June 2020
    Publisher:  CESifo, Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute, Munich, Germany

    We analyse two mechanism designs for refunding emission payments to polluting firms: output-based refunding (OBR) and expenditure-based refunding (EBR). In both instruments, emission fees are returned to the polluting industry, typically making the... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signature:
    DS 63
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

     

    We analyse two mechanism designs for refunding emission payments to polluting firms: output-based refunding (OBR) and expenditure-based refunding (EBR). In both instruments, emission fees are returned to the polluting industry, typically making the policy more politically acceptable than a standard tax. The crucial difference between OBR and EBR is that the fees are refunded in proportion to output in the former but in proportion to the firms’ expenditure on abatement technology equipment in the latter. To achieve the same abatement target as a standard tax, the fee level in the OBR design is higher, whereas the fee level in the EBR design is lower. The use of OBR and EBR may lead to large differences in the distribution of output and costs across firms. Both designs imply a cost-ineffective provision of abatement, as firms put relatively too much effort into reducing emissions through abatement technology compared with reducing output. However, a standard tax may be politically infeasible and maintaining output may be seen as a political advantage by policymakers if they seek to avoid activity reduction in the regulated sector.

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/223436
    Series: CESifo working paper ; no. 8364 (2020)
    Subjects: emission payments; carbon tax; refunding; CO2; NOX; policy design
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 50 Seiten)