Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 2 of 2.

  1. Kill your darlings?
    do new aid flows help achieve a poverty minimizing allocation of aid
    Published: 2021
    Publisher:  Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, [Göteborg]

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 50
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 2077/70180
    Series: Working paper in economics ; 815
    Subjects: Aid allocation; Poverty; Donors; Official development assistance; Other official flows
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 63 Seiten), Illustrationen
  2. Kill your darlings?
    do new aid flows help achieve a poverty minimizing allocation of aid?
    Published: November 11, 2021
    Publisher:  Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

    In this study, we derive a poverty-minimizing allocation rule, based on which we assess the povertyefficiency of actual aid allocations, with a special focus on the comparative impact of new donors and new non-aid flows. The results suggest a... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 206
    No inter-library loan

     

    In this study, we derive a poverty-minimizing allocation rule, based on which we assess the povertyefficiency of actual aid allocations, with a special focus on the comparative impact of new donors and new non-aid flows. The results suggest a substantial misallocation of aid. Our benchmark estimates indicate that donors should reallocate nearly half the total aid budget from aid darlings (countries receiving more aid than the allocation rule specifies) to aid orphans (countries receiving less aid than the allocation rule specifies). The estimated poverty-reducing efficiency varies considerably across donors. Whereas new global actors such as the Gates foundation perform well above average, the non-DAC bilateral donors perform clearly worse. Overall, neither the new donors nor the new financial flows alleviate the observed misallocation of aid. While the new donors stand for a non-negligible share of overall poverty reduction, together they perform below average in terms of poverty reduction per aid dollar. Similarly, rather than counteracting the relative neglect of countries identified as particularly underfunded in terms of aid, the non-aid financial flows add to the inequitable distribution. Based on an extensive battery of alternative model calibrations, we establish upper and lower bounds on our estimates, allowing for clear policy recommendations.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/262029
    Series: IFN working paper ; no. 1415 (2021)
    Subjects: Aid allocation; Poverty; Donors; Official development assistance; Other official flows
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 65 Seiten), Illustrationen