Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.

  1. Comparative techno-economic evaluation of LTE fixed wireless access and FTTdp G.fast network deployment for providing broadband services of at least 30Mbps in rural areas
    Published: 2018
    Publisher:  International Telecommunications Society, Trento

    In rural areas in Europe, the deployment of High-Speed Broadband access networks lags behind in urban and suburban areas due to difficulties of deployment of fiber in the final meters. FTTdp networks using G.fast have been proposed as a... more

    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DSM 92
    No inter-library loan

     

    In rural areas in Europe, the deployment of High-Speed Broadband access networks lags behind in urban and suburban areas due to difficulties of deployment of fiber in the final meters. FTTdp networks using G.fast have been proposed as a cost-effective alternative to FTTH and FTTB [1] especially in rural areas [2] where FTTC and VDSL cannot always deliver service speeds of 30Mbps which is the minimum bandwidth defined in the European Digital Agenda as target to be met by 2020. However, fixed wireless access (FWA) networks based on LTE technology can be used as a "last mile" solution to provide high-speed broadband access to areas where fixed broadband is limited [3]–[5]. On the other hand, LTE technology offers high speed connections able to support internet browsing and IP services, while it can theoretically support up to 300 Mbps depending on network load and sharing. Thus, it can be considered as a true alternative to any fixed solution. In this paper, a techno-economic study is performed to assess the feasibility of a FWA network deployment based on LTE technology in comparison to FTTdp G.fast network rollout for delivering service speeds of 30Mbps in rural areas. We present cash flow results and standard financial indexes for the business cases discussed. The results are being appraised through a sensitivity and risk analysis to determine the most influential factors on the return on the investment. We also discuss the (non) profitability of both cases and the subsidization needed from structural funds. The results aim to contribute in the debate over network evolution scenarios among academia, industry, regulators, policy makers and governments.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/184946
    Series: Towards a digital future : turning technology into markets? : Trento, Italy, 1st – 4th August 2018 / 28th ITS European Conference 2018
    Subjects: Techno-economic; NPV; LTE; G.fast; FWA; FTTdp; FTTx; digital agenda; subsidization; NGA; Broadband
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 14 Seiten), Illustrationen
  2. Who wins and who loses from state subsidies?
    Published: 2023
    Publisher:  Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Kiel

  3. Long term care partnerships
    are they "fit for purpose"?
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  CESifo, München

    The risk of high costs of long-term care services and supports (LTSS) is one of the largest uninsured risks for American families and a major challenge to the sustainability of Medicaid. To address the latter, the long-term care partnership (LTCP)... more

    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    No inter-library loan
    Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 63 (5155)
    No inter-library loan

     

    The risk of high costs of long-term care services and supports (LTSS) is one of the largest uninsured risks for American families and a major challenge to the sustainability of Medicaid. To address the latter, the long-term care partnership (LTCP) program was an initiative designed to encourage middle-class individuals to purchase private long-term care insurance to cover at least the non-catastrophic costs of LTSS. The goal was to defer the time when an individual would become eligible for Medicaid to pay her LTSS expenses, and thereby reduce Medicaid expenditures. This paper exploits two unique sources of variation in the effects of LTCP, (i) the long term effects in the four states that were allowed to implement partnership programs in 1993-4, and (ii) the short-term effects in the states that implemented LTCP programs after 2005. Given the progressive development of the LTCP, we identify differences in trends in insurance uptake and Medicaid long-term care expenditures and claims. Both sources of variation suggest LTCP programs modestly stimulated LTC insurance uptake and slowed Medicaid LTC expenditures and claims trends.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/107376
    RVK Categories: QB 910
    Series: Array ; 5155
    Subjects: Long Term Care (LTC) Insurance; LTC Partnerships (LTCP); subsidization; medicaid; differences in trends; catastrophic costs
    Scope: Online-Ressource (41 S.), graph. Darst.