Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 4 of 4.

  1. Theorienreduktion in den Sozialwissenschaften: eine Fallstudie am Beispiel der Balancetheorien
    Published: 1998

    Abstract: A central topic both in philosophy of science as well as in the empirical sciences is the reconstruction of the relations between theories. In the past comparisons of theories by means of traditional linguistic methods have proved to be... more

     

    Abstract: A central topic both in philosophy of science as well as in the empirical sciences is the reconstruction of the relations between theories. In the past comparisons of theories by means of traditional linguistic methods have proved to be extremely difficult and complicated. In this article the reconstruction of intertheoretical relations based on model-theoretical terms is propagated, as formulated within the structuralist view of theories. The efficiency of a model theoretical based comparison of theories is demonstrated by two theory elements from the social science research program of balance theories: The basic element by Heider and the transitivity theory by Holland and Leinhardt. First of all both theory elements are introduced informally and reconstructed in the structuralist format. On the basis of these reconstructions can be shown, that the Heider theory can be formally reduced to the Holland-Leinhardt theory and that the theory younger in history means an improvement. How

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/5267
    DDC Categories: 300; 301
    Subjects: Sozialwissenschaften; Kognitive Balance; Theorie
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Theorie; (thesoz)Modelltheorie; (thesoz)Strukturalismus; (thesoz)Gleichgewichtstheorie; (thesoz)Sozialwissenschaft; (thesoz)Wissenschaftstheorie; (thesoz)Theorievergleich; balance theories; intertheoretical relations; reduction; social sciences; structuralistreconstruction
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet

    In: Journal for General Philosophy of Science ; 29 (1998) 2 ; 301-326

  2. Iconizing the Digital Humanities: Models and Modeling from a Semiotic Perspective

    Abstract: Models are ubiquitous in the digital humanities. Against the backdrop of the recent discussion in the philosophy of science about what models are and what they do, this paper presents a semiotic perspective on models in the framework of... more

     

    Abstract: Models are ubiquitous in the digital humanities. Against the backdrop of the recent discussion in the philosophy of science about what models are and what they do, this paper presents a semiotic perspective on models in the framework of Charles S. Peirce’s theory of signs that sheds light on the practice of modeling in the digital humanities. As a first step, it is argued that models are icons, i.e. signs that represent their specific objects by being regarded as similar to them; and that there are, in all, three basic types of model, namely “images,” “diagrams,” and “metaphors.” A second step explicates relevant implications of this model-theoretic approach, especially as they relate to the digital humanities. In particular, it is shown that models are not identical to the things they represent and that they only represent them partially; that the representation operates on the basis of a mapping relation between select properties of the model and its object; that each model and e

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/60507
    Parent title:
    Veröffentlichungsversion
    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
    Enthalten in: Historical social research / Supplement. Supplement; Mannheim : GESIS, 1988-; Heft 31 (2018), 124-146; Online-Ressource
    DDC Categories: 500
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Peirce, C.; (thesoz)Modelltheorie; (thesoz)Repräsentation; (thesoz)Semiotik; (thesoz)Geisteswissenschaft; (thesoz)Definition; (thesoz)Informatik; (thesoz)Modell; (thesoz)Repräsentativität; (thesoz)Metapher; Models; Icons; Images; Diagrams; Metaphors, C. S. Peirce, Digital Humanities
    Scope: Online-Ressource
  3. How to Recognize a Model When You See One. Or: Claudia Schiffer and the Climate Change

    Abstract: “Model”, at first sight, is a non-academic word with a wide circulation in a variety of conversational and non-technical written discourses. In, but also beyond that it is used in different situations, in different fields, by different... more

     

    Abstract: “Model”, at first sight, is a non-academic word with a wide circulation in a variety of conversational and non-technical written discourses. In, but also beyond that it is used in different situations, in different fields, by different disciplines. It changes its meaning in these respective contexts. But how far? If there remains a common conceptual core, we would learn a lot about the essence of the notion of model as a widely shared concept. If it turns out that the usage of the word makes model a homonym with completely distinct meanings, we have to sharply distinguish who is using it in which context. To further research these questions, we need to observe where and how we encounter models in our daily and scholarly life

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/60502
    Parent title:
    Veröffentlichungsversion
    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
    Enthalten in: Historical social research / Supplement. Supplement; Mannheim : GESIS, 1988-; Heft 31 (2018), 183-192; Online-Ressource
    DDC Categories: 500
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Modelltheorie; (thesoz)Geisteswissenschaft; (thesoz)Begriff; (thesoz)Definition; (thesoz)Interdisziplinarität; (thesoz)Informatik; (thesoz)Modell; (thesoz)Phänomenologie; (thesoz)Wissenschaftstheorie; (thesoz)Mode; (thesoz)Semantik; (thesoz)Bedeutung; Word and Meaning; Phenomenology; Kinds of Models
    Scope: Online-Ressource
  4. Models and Modelling between Digital and Humanities: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
    Contributor: Ciula, Arianna (Herausgeber); Eide, Øyvind (Herausgeber); Marras, Cristina (Herausgeber); Sahle, Patrick (Herausgeber)
    Published: 2018

    Abstract: This Supplement of Historical Social Research stems from the contributions on the topic of modelling presented at the workshop “Thinking in Practice”, held at Wahn Manor House in Cologne on January 19-20, 2017. With Digital Humanities as... more

     

    Abstract: This Supplement of Historical Social Research stems from the contributions on the topic of modelling presented at the workshop “Thinking in Practice”, held at Wahn Manor House in Cologne on January 19-20, 2017. With Digital Humanities as starting point, practical examples of model building from different disciplines are considered, with the aim of contributing to the dialogue on modelling from several perspectives. Combined with theoretical considerations, this collection illustrates how the process of modelling is one of coming to know, in which the purpose of each modelling activity and the form in which models are expressed has to be taken into consideration in tandem. The modelling processes presented in this volume belong to specific traditions of scholarly and practical thinking as well as to specific contexts of production and use of models. The claim that supported the project workshop was indeed that establishing connections between different traditions of and approaches t

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Contributor: Ciula, Arianna (Herausgeber); Eide, Øyvind (Herausgeber); Marras, Cristina (Herausgeber); Sahle, Patrick (Herausgeber)
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/62883
    DDC Categories: 300
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Modelltheorie; (thesoz)Geisteswissenschaft; (thesoz)Digitalisierung; (thesoz)Interdisziplinarität; (thesoz)Sozialgeschichte; (thesoz)interdisziplinäre Forschung; (thesoz)historische Sozialforschung; (thesoz)Visualisierung; (thesoz)Modellentwicklung; Modelling; Digital Humanities; Multidisciplinarity; Visualization
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)