Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 24 von 24.

  1. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  <<de>> Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Institut für Anglistik, Bibliothek
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 -
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Fakultät für Philologie, Germanistisches Institut, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    Zd 2007
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 -
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Institut für Skandinavistik / Fennistik, Abteilung Skandinavistik, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    9/1025
    Bestandsinformationen
    9.2015,1
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  2. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  <<de>> Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, Hauptabteilung
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800); Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie; Zeitschrift;
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl
  3. Journal of literary theory
    Vol.15.2021,No.1/2
    Erschienen: 2021
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Mehrbändiges Werk
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory - Alle Bände anzeigen
  4. Journal of literary theory
    Vol.16.2022,No.2, Memory and literature
    Erschienen: 2022
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Mehrbändiges Werk
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory - Alle Bände anzeigen
  5. Journal of literary theory
    Vol.16.2022,No.1
    Erschienen: 2022
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Mehrbändiges Werk
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory - Alle Bände anzeigen
  6. Journal of literary theory
    Vol.17.2023,No.2, Special Issue Literary theory and the network turn
    Erschienen: 2023
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Mehrbändiges Werk
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory - Alle Bände anzeigen
  7. Journal of literary theory
    Vol.17.2023,No.1
    Erschienen: 2023
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Mehrbändiges Werk
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory - Alle Bände anzeigen
  8. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
    Signatur:
    HM 5: H 371
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 16.2022
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universität Mainz, Bereichsbibliothek Philosophicum, Standort Anglistik/ Amerikanistik
    Signatur:
    L/Z J 7
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007,1
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Zs 03127
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007,1
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Online Contents Komparatistik
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800); Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  9. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
    Signatur:
    HM 5: H 371
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 16.2022
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt
    Titel im lokalen Katalog:
    https://hds.hebis.de/ubffm/Record/HEB182057690
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Fachkatalog AVL
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800); Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  10. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Signatur:
    Zsn 120956
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 7.2013
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Z 2007 A 501
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007,1 -
    Standort:
    Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Z 2007 A 501
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007,1 -

    Standort:
    Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen
    Signatur:
    C-1 1014
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 17.2023,1; 17.2023,2 -
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    Signatur:
    AA jlt
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 -
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim
    Signatur:
    Z GER : J54
    Bestandsinformationen
    2.2008-
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Xa 5279
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universität Konstanz, Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
    Signatur:
    lit 2/j60
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 17.2023
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Z-Lit 43
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007-9.2015
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Deutsches Literaturarchiv Marbach, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    X
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 4.2010
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universität Stuttgart, Bibliothek der Institute für Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft
    Signatur:
    U1--JOU72
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Brechtbau-Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    Allg Z/Jou 40
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 9.2015
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Klassik Stiftung Weimar / Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    ZA 5102
    Bestandsinformationen
    6.2012,2 -
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie;
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  11. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Institut für Anglistik, Bibliothek
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 ->
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Signatur:
    Zsn 120956
    Bestandsinformationen
    <Jahrgänge bis einschließlich 2010 im Außenmagazin>
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin, Haus Amerika-Gedenkbibliothek und Haus Berliner Stadtbibliothek
    Signatur:
    L 1 ZA 2918
    Bestandsinformationen
    <Standort: Letzte 5 Jg. AGB; davor BStB>
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Fakultät für Philologie, Germanistisches Institut, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    Zd 2007
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 ->
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
    Signatur:
    Z 2007 A 501
    Bestandsinformationen
    <Ab 2021 Einzelheftnachweis>
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
    Signatur:
    Zs 24835
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 ->
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universität Hamburg, Fachbereichsbibliothek SLM, Teilbibliothek NdL
    Signatur:
    AA jlt
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 ->
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim
    Signatur:
    Z GER : J54
    Bestandsinformationen
    <2.2008->
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Xa 5279
    Bestandsinformationen
    <*6 ; *1>
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universität Konstanz, Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
    Signatur:
    lit 2/j60
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 ->
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Leipzig
    Signatur:
    Z 2007 A 501
    Bestandsinformationen
    <Ab 2021 Einzelheftnachweis>
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Z-Lit 43
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007-9.2015>
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universität Mainz, Bereichsbibliothek Philosophicum, Standort Anglistik/ Amerikanistik
    Signatur:
    L/Z J 7
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007,1>
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Deutsches Literaturarchiv Marbach, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    X
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 - 4.2010>
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Zs 03127
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007,1>
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Z 2008.282
    Bestandsinformationen
    <1.2007 ->
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Brechtbau-Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    Allg Z/Jou 40
    Bestandsinformationen
    <Weitere Jahrgänge nur online vorhanden>
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Klassik Stiftung Weimar / Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    ZA 5102
    Bestandsinformationen
    <Neueste Hefte Zeitschriftenauslage ; Ausleihe/Vormerken über Einzelbände ("zugehörige Publikationen")>
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  12. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  <<de>> Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  13. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie;
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  14. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter Recht, Berlin

    Standort:
    Verbund der Öffentlichen Bibliotheken Berlins - VÖBB
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.

    Beitr. teilw. dt., teilw. engl.
  15. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.
  16. Laughing at the Body: Approaches to a Performative Theory of Humor
    Autor*in: Velten, Hans Rudolf
    Erschienen: 2009
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    In prevalent theories of the comic, whether literary, philosophical-aesthetic, linguistic or psychological in origin, the humor of the human body plays a subordinate role. It is addressed as a humor of situation or movement, as ›lower‹ or (for the... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    In prevalent theories of the comic, whether literary, philosophical-aesthetic, linguistic or psychological in origin, the humor of the human body plays a subordinate role. It is addressed as a humor of situation or movement, as ›lower‹ or (for the literature up to 1700) farcical humor, and therefore used as a blurry sub-type. The body is imponderable for such a concept of humor that, since Kant and Jean Paul, is subsumed under aesthetic perception and excludes the body or, at most, treats it as a phenomenon represented by language. The body is also unwieldy for linguistic and semantic theories of humor or of the joke, as they can be found in some types of cognitive models of linguistic or logic incongruity, overlap or opposition of scripts, in interdisciplinary humor research.This article aims at uncoupling the possibilities of a humor of the human body from linguistic-semantic and ontological concepts and at exploring the topic of bodily causes for laughter in theatre and literature from a performative perspective, i. e. from the perspective of a theory of action and perception. Thereby a whole range of problems in older literature (which up to now have been discussed within the Bakhtin concept of the ›grotesque body‹) can be analyzed, as well as the complex phenomena of ›comic figures‹ on stage and in literary texts.The article explores two questions: 1. How can comical stagings of the body that aim at laughter be described and explained in their functioning? 2. By the aid of which linguistic strategies are these stagings produced in literary texts? In order to answer these questions, the article starts by giving a survey of the most relevant approaches towards a theory of bodily humor: Bergson's mechanism thesis, Freud's thesis of Aufwandsdifferenz (difference of effort) and Plessner's idea of bodily disorganization are evaluated in terms of their applicability. All three theories point out the multifold meanings of the body in comical situations or processes. Bergson assumes the comical in the sudden shift of our attention from soul to body. Freud grounds his thoughts in the psychological activity of innervation at comparing the »effort« of one's own and others. Plessner views humor as a cause for laughter that overstrains the spectator and in which the tension between »Leib sein« (to be a body) and »Körper haben« (to have a body) becomes visible.Thereby the body as a cause for laughter is revaluated. Its humor is not structural, but bears the characteristics of an event. Still, the psychological effects in the interaction of comical object and laughing subject remain disputed. Consequently, the article explores the conditions and functionings of perception of the comical body by combining approaches from phenomenology and neuro-physiology. The main interest here is an understanding of laughter as »Widerfahrnis« (befalling) and »Einleibung« (embodiment) (Waldenfels, Schmitz, Merlau-Ponty), which findings are confirmed by the neuro-scientific theory of mirror neurons (Rizzolati, Warren, et al.). Laughing at bodies appears to be an attentional kind of comprehension of bodily inappropriateness and loss of control in a playful frame or mode. This refers to nonverbal humor of the body in movement, proximity, mimics and gestures, in voice, para-language and body noises on the one hand, and in body related semantics of utterances on the other hand.The humor of this cannot be described structurally or ontologically, but modally, in reference to the situation and the performance of the body in question. The last part of the article illuminates in which way this humor can be experienced outside of theatrical as-if situations, in a literary text. Here the embedding of body humor within language and the bodily quality of language are discussed. Two aspects are important: firstly, the question of how traces of comical speech and their corporal effects like intonation, emphasis, or sound can be staged in literature, and secondly, the problem of how language can ›stage‹ and ›orchestrate‹ bodies in a way that readers can perceive the humor of the body and the situational transgressions that are combined with them. The semiotic signs of the text world function as ›embodied‹ apperceptions, which are related to the phantasm of laughter as an act of distancing. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Weitere Schlagworte: Literatur (Belletristik) und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (21 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.
  17. Hypothetischer Intentionalismus. Rekonstruktion und Kritik
    Autor*in: Spoerhase, Carlos
    Erschienen: 2007
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    Hypothetical IntentionalismThe intentional fallacy debate marked the beginning of an extensive discussion about the role of intentions in the scholarly interpretation of literature. For a long time, treatments of intentionalism in the study of... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    Hypothetical IntentionalismThe intentional fallacy debate marked the beginning of an extensive discussion about the role of intentions in the scholarly interpretation of literature. For a long time, treatments of intentionalism in the study of literature were centred on the question of whether the actual intentions of a text's author should or should not be taken into account when interpreting that text. This meant that the argument became reduced to a question of whether one adopted a positive or negative attitude to the relevance of actual intentions. More recently, however, the situation has increased in complexity. Alongside actual intentionalism, rival positions such as hypothetical intentionalism and fictionalist intentionalism are attracting increasing attention in present-day discussions of intentionalism.At the beginning of this article, the rival positions in the discussion of intentionalism are described as follows, drawing on the terminology of current Anglo-American work: (I) anti-intentionalism can be divided into (1) conventionalist forms and (2) forms that stress the value of the work as a self-contained whole; (II) intentionalism can be divided into (1) forms of actual intentionalism, either (a) extreme or (b) moderate, and (2) forms of hypothetical intentionalism, either (a) conjectural or (b) fictional. In recent theoretical debate, it is above all the position of hypothetical intentionalism that has been felt to offer the best chance of future progress. Taking this impression as my starting point, I begin by outlining the problems of literary theory that provide the context in which hypothetical intentionalism can be reconstructed as an approach to solving the problem of intentions (section 1). Hypothetical intentionalism owes its popularity to the fact that, even though previous intentionalistic theories have all been dogged by substantial problems, there is still an underlying desire for an intentionalistic concept of interpretation. Hypothetical intentionalism can be described as prompting literary theory to develop a new intentionalistic stance, one capable of overcoming the difficulties of actual intentionalism.Next, I reconstruct the most important forms of hypothetical intentionalism, including those of Alexander Nehamas, William Tolhurst, Jerrold Levinson, and Gregory Currie, from a critical perspective (sections 2.1 to 2.4). The reconstructions show that hypothetical intentionalism is typically marked by a theoretical perspective centred on the receiving entity in the act of literary communication, whereas actual intentionalism retained a genetic perspective centred on the producing agent. As analysis of the various formulations of hypothetical intentionalism shows, though, the conceptual differences between its supporters are so marked that we can at best speak in the plural of hypothetical intentionalisms that promise to solve what are at times dissimilar problems of literary theory.Taking the reconstruction of the various hypothetical intentionalisms as my starting point, I then point out serious problems in the definitions of hypothetical intentionalism that have been put forward to date (section 3). My criticisms include the fact that the relationship between hypothetical intentionalism and actual intentionalism is unspecified; that the concept of the hypothetical, central to all stances based on hypothetical intentionalism, is deployed in an ambiguous manner; and that the status of the receiving entity, the central participant in communication for hypothetical intentionalism, is unclear (it usually vacillates between factual and counterfactual status). Hypothetical intentionalism is faced here with problems of construction that were typical also of approaches to interpretation based on reception history or the aesthetics of reception.The various forms of hypothetical intentionalism are faced with a number of problems. The primary factor behind them can be identified with reference to current systematic overviews of the most important theoretical options available in the discussion of intentionalism in literary theory: the concept of the hypothetical is contrasted with that of the actual (section 4). Progress in the discussion of intentionalism is hindered by the concept of the hypothetical because it leads to the systematic confusion of metaphysical and epistemological issues. Finally, I present a terminological apparatus for future consideration. Its conceptual clarity is superior to that of previous terminologies, and it allows us to separate clearly for the first time the ontological and epistemological aspects of the debate on hypothetical intentionalism as it has unfolded to date. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Weitere Schlagworte: Literatur (Belletristik) und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
  18. Autorfunktionen in literaturwissenschaftlicher Theorie und interpretativer Praxis. Eine Gegenüberstellung
    Autor*in: Willand, Marcus
    Erschienen: 2011
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    The debate about the ›return of the author‹ (Jannidis et al., Möglichkeiten eines Begriffs zwischen Text und historischem Kontext, 1999) or the return of the author as an author-function (Spoerhase), which has become increasingly nuanced over the... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    The debate about the ›return of the author‹ (Jannidis et al., Möglichkeiten eines Begriffs zwischen Text und historischem Kontext, 1999) or the return of the author as an author-function (Spoerhase), which has become increasingly nuanced over the last ten years, is in a sense analogous to the efforts to give a scientific foundation to literary studies in the 1970s. Both have to face the reproach that their anticipations about research have not (yet) been realized. The early calls for an increased scientific element (Wissenschaftlichkeit) in interpretive argumentation in literary studies must in retrospect be treated as having failed completely. It seems, however – not least according to a study by Winko (Zur argumentativen Verwendung von Autorkonzepten in der gegenwärtigen literaturwissenschaftlichen Interpretationspraxis, 2002) – that the re-theorization of the author cannot be confined to propositions within theory but finds its real legitimation in the practices of interpretation that are specific to literary studies. Building on this, a corpus of forty interpretations of Lenz's drama Die Soldaten (›The Soldiers‹) was analysed with reference to the functionalizations of the author-concept in the argumentation through which meaning is ascribed. These functions identified in practice are compared with the authorfunctions previously postulated by the theories in question. It is intended that this comparison should result not in a tirade that exposes misguided interpretations or criticizes theoretical positions, but rather in a productive praxeology that could make the way in which interpretation functions in practice relevant to the formation of theories.An introduction to the problematic field at stake, defined by theoretical debates on authorship and the relationship between theory and practice, is followed by necessary remarks on the definition of concepts that are familiar from the debate and the distinctions between them. ›Author-construct‹ is a term grounded in theory and describes – as does the synonymously used ›author-concept‹ – the totality of the interpretive operations with which the author can be functionalized on the basis of particular theoretical premises. ›Author‹ here does not mean the historical individual but always takes into account the fact that in interpretive arguments it is only the mental construction of the historical individual, as performed by the interpreter, that can be meant. Taking this further, ›author-function‹, as a shorthand for ›author-concept function‹, stands for the functions that the author-concept acquires in interpretations. The term therefore, because it always describes functions that are ascribed by the interpreter, necessarily refers not to the real author but to the author-concept of that interpreter. The theoretically postulated author-concept/-construct is in turn to be distinguished from the author-figuration. Whereas the former describes the sum of the functions that can be legitimately used in a theory, the latter consists of the author-functions that are actually employed in the interpretive practice of that theory. Both are composed of the particular relationship between individual functions in which the author is employed in the argumentation that ascribes meanings to texts.This terminological clarification is, granted, somewhat laborious, but it is unavoidable. It is followed by a description of the method of analysis employed. Two analyses of author-functions from the corpus are reviewed in detail as models; in the process, the arguments of their interpretations are examined and their ascriptions of meaning through the author-figuration are reconstructed. The authorfunctions identified in this way form function-clusters specific to each individual interpretation – bundles of functionalizations that are combined in interpretation and are compared subsequently with concisely reconstructed clusters from other analyses in the corpus. The analysis of an interpretation grounded in social history and discourse analysis is paired with an interpretation in which Lenz's poetological and literary works are examined by means of, on the one hand, a concept of genius based on authorial intention, and, on the other, an approach drawn from systems and action theory. Finally, in addition to an attempt to categorize the types of functionalization and a presentation of their problems, which follow at least in part from inconsistently designed theories, a hypothesis regarding the relationship between theory and practice is formulated. The hypothesis results from the finding obtained, which is that interpretive practice has seen the development of conventionalized standards of author-related argumentation that have to date been considered only insufficiently in the theoretical discussion with its normative character, but whose practical concept of authorship supports the theoretical legitimacy of author-related approaches. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Weitere Schlagworte: Literatur (Belletristik) und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
  19. Beobachtungen zu den Voraussetzungen des hypothetisch-deduktiven und des hypothetisch-induktiven Argumentierens im Rahmen einer hermeneutischen Konzeption der Textinterpretation
    Autor*in: Danneberg, Lutz; Albrecht, Andrea
    Erschienen: 2016
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    The contribution clarifies from an epistemological and hermeneutical perspective some of the indispensable assumptions which are generally made during hypothetical deductive and hypothetical inductive inferences in text interpretations, but which are... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    The contribution clarifies from an epistemological and hermeneutical perspective some of the indispensable assumptions which are generally made during hypothetical deductive and hypothetical inductive inferences in text interpretations, but which are rarely reflected as such. The modes of inference of the natural sciences often serve as a model for, e. g., a ›hermeneutics of nature‹, even though these modes of inference cannot be directly compared to those of the humanities (1). In order to understand the conditions for making such a comparison, we consider the problem of interpretation conceived as the problem of the arbitrariness of interpretations. This problem, which has the three components of question, of evaluation, and of knowledge, can be solved by a concept of interpretation in which the arbitrariness is avoided or limited by a methodology of text interpretation (2). Meeting the general demands of a theory/methodology of interpretation requires us to explicitly specify the underlying concepts of meaning and interpretation (3). When interpretation is understood as relating a text to a context, the concept of meaning fixes a primary context for this text-context relation. The concept of interpretation associated to the concept of meaning distinguishes further contexts, possibly in a hierarchical order. Relations between different interpretations can then be analyzed as relations between the concepts of meaning and interpretation. Furthermore, disputes about the sense and relevance of questions can then be understood analytically as well as historically. We illustrate this with the example of the question whether Don Quixote was a Marrano. This will show that even with fixed concepts of meaning and interpretation no a priori criteria for the definitive closure of the interpretation of a work of literature can be given (4). Inferences of interpretation presuppose relations of meaning, by which we understand a relation between the signifier and the signified. For poetic texts the manifold dimensions of the differences between semantic, exemplifying, and analogical relations of meaning have to be taken into account, which may, with respect to a given text, be mutually in competition or in support. We illustrate this with the example of Hugo von Hofmannsthal’s Chandos letter. Exemplifications and analogies often enlarge the spectrum of meaning of poetic texts (5). Among the requirements of text interpretations we also count general background assumptions. In addition to heuristic assumptions there are presumptions. While hypothetical assumptions do not have to be justified a priori and while assertions do require proof, for a presumption the burden of proof lies with the critic. The status of a presumption is determined by the epistemic situation in which the interpretation is carried out (6). When the validity of two hypotheses of interpretation is to be compared, the hypotheses have to be evaluated. The evaluation of the plausibility of an interpretation can refer to either the initial hypotheses or the results of the interpretation. We observe that, just like in the natural sciences, evaluative decisions are underdetermined. In this context we also briefly comment on some assumptions concerning the ›inference to the best explanation‹ (7). Finally, we deal with the often raised suspicion of circularity of hermeneutic arguments. This suspicion is frequently declared to be the central difference between inferences in the natural sciences as opposed to inferences in the humanities. Historically, the hermeneutic circle and its inevitability is an invention of modernity. It can be shown systematically that not every circular inference needs to be vicious. Rather, whether it is vicious or not is rather determined by the epistemic situation. As long as the implicit knowledge that guides an argument is not fully explored, the circular or non-circular character of an argument cannot be judged (8). Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of Literary Theory; Berlin : De Gruyter; 10,2016,1, Seiten 1-37
    Weitere Schlagworte: Theorie der Interpretation; Methodologie; Schluss auf die beste Erklärung; Literatur und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (37 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
  20. Lässt sich literarischer Wandel erklären? Struktur, Gültigkeitsbedingungen und Reichweite verschiedener Erklärungstypen in der Literaturgeschichtsschreibung
    Autor*in: Gittel, Benjamin
    Erschienen: 2016
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    Although literary critics continue to make programmatic claims about not only describing but also explaining literary change, and numerous textbooks and individual studies in literary history insinuate or claim to explain literary change,... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    Although literary critics continue to make programmatic claims about not only describing but also explaining literary change, and numerous textbooks and individual studies in literary history insinuate or claim to explain literary change, explanations of literary change are as of yet insufficiently reflected in the field’s methodology. Is it at all possible to provide explanations in literary history, where no strict laws have been discovered yet? If yes, what do these explanations look like and in which circumstances are they valid? Understanding literary change as the variance in a specific genre’s instantiation over time, this paper works from the point of departure of explanatory pluralism, the assumption that scientific explanations are to a certain degree discipline-specific and that various different types of explanations exist. The paper aims at an interpenetration of theory and practice and therefore analyzes different types of explanations through a concrete example of literary change. In particular, it focuses on the boom of fictional essay writing that occurred during the first third of the 20th century in German-speaking countries, thus analyzing the two trends of the fictionalization of the essay and the insertion of essayistic passages into fictional texts (e. g., the essayistic novel). The paper examines causal, statistical, intentional, functional, teleological and structur­al explanations for this literary change. Causal explanations, it is argued, cannot be employed as long as no general laws for literary change have been identified. However, it is possible to identify certain causal factors for literary change through the interplay of biographic and intertextual studies, which can be further validated by statistical approaches. Intentional explanations of literary change can generally be created through the time-consuming process of collecting explanations for the writing of single works, but they face the problem that author’s intentions, as reported in self-commen­taries or poetological texts, are often too unspecific or too specific for the work being explained. Functional explanations face two difficulties. First, literature rarely solves social problems, and therefore the benefit that functional explanations presuppose can usually only consist in the thematization of social problems. Second, the causal feedback mechanism that underlies functional explanations presupposes a mechanism for social selection amongst works of literature that promotes works that have social benefit. However, only a very idealized literature market could provide for social selection along these lines. Teleological explanations, which ascribe inherent development trends to genres, are not only dubious from the perspective of the philosophy of science, but fail to explain why these trends manifest themselves in specific historical situations. Structural explana­tions identify underlying ›deep structures‹ of text corpora that might correspond to social or ideational structures. These explanations, however, are also question­able, because they usually don’t provide information about the causal mechanisms that may lead to this correspondence. Two consequences, this paper argues, can be drawn from the analysis of various types of explanation of literary change. Concluding that full-fledged explanations of literary change are either very time-consuming and laborious (statistical and additive intentional explanations), or only employable under specific conditions and idealizing background assumptions (functional explanations), it suggests the follow­ing. First, literary scholars could revise their practice of answering ›why‹ questions in literary history and abstain from explaining literary change except in those cases when they elaborated full-fledged explanations. Second, alternatively, they could continue their existing practice but refrain from describing it as ›explaining‹ literary change. Instead, they could describe their activity in less demanding terms, e. g. as ›the search for overarching narratives‹, which nevertheless is of value in terms of didactics, knowledge synthesis, or the reduction of complexity. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory : JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines; Berlin : de Gruyter; 10,2016,2, Seiten 303-344
    Weitere Schlagworte: Schlagworteexplanatorischer Pluralismus; funktionale Erklärung; Funktion; literarische Evolution; Literaturgeschichte; Literatur und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (42 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
  21. Ich und mein Dämon. Unfreiwillige Kollaborationen und die Konstitution weiblicher Autorschaft in Bettina von Arnims Goethe’s Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde
    Autor*in: Thomalla, Erika
    Erschienen: 2022
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    The paper argues that the ways in which editors shape cultural perceptions of authors, or their works, are only partially evident from theoretical writings and testimonies. Programmes and practices of editing often do not coincide, they can even... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    The paper argues that the ways in which editors shape cultural perceptions of authors, or their works, are only partially evident from theoretical writings and testimonies. Programmes and practices of editing often do not coincide, they can even contradict each other. This is not necessarily due to a lack of consistency, but to the fact that there is an inherent logic to editorial practice that is sometimes not even fully reflected upon by the professionals and experts within the community. What is needed, it is argued, is a praxeological approach that looks at the practices of selecting and editing, framing and medially placing texts, as well as the social, economical and political aspects of editions in concrete historical constellations. Thus, fundamental tensions that characterize the practice of modern editing since the beginning become visible. In the nineteenth century, a notion of editorship as a purely reproductive activity emerged. Editors were not allowed anymore to make any interventions in the texts. However, this concept of editorship contrasted with the idea that the editor should become a second maker, by not only replicating the original creative activity, but claiming to be able to understand the author better than the author understands him- or herself. The collaborative practice of editorship therefore equally works in favour of the author and against the author. Bettina von Arnim’s literary debut Goethe’s Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde (1835) is used as an example to illustrate this basic problem of modern editorship. In Arnim’s work, different functions and programmatics of editorship come together. Goethe’s Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde is situated between a poetic form of appropriation and a poeto-philological practice of editing. It is both an act of memorialization and an attempt by the editor to secure a place for herself in the literary field. Through her editing of the letters and their arrangement, Arnim initially places herself in the role of one of Goethe’s imaginary sister: At the end of the first part of the correspondence, Arnim is asked by Goethe’s mother to write down the story of Karoline von Günderrode. Thus, she composes a female Wertheriade. In the second part, Arnim stages herself as the poet’s muse by putting words into her own mouth in the letters to Goethe that later reappear in his poems. Finally, Arnim repeatedly slips into the role of Goethe’s female characters and continues their stories on her own authority. While the second part of the correspondence ends with Goethe’s death, the third part, the Tagebuch (Diary), becomes the initiation of Arnim’s own authorship. Here the dialogue turns into a monologue. The logic of inspiration is reversed: Arnim becomes a poet kissed and blessed by the muse Goethe. Owing to its fictional elements, Goethe’s Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde has tended to be regarded in German-studies scholarship as an epistolary novel or artistic adaptation rather than as an ›edition‹ in the proper sense of the word. This article, on the contrary, argues that the book illuminates a fundamental contradiction of modern editing precisely because of its intermediate status between philology and poetry. Editorial activities always aim to establish an authentic speech and a specific form of authorship. Even as nineteenth-century editorial philology formed an ethos that prohibited purposeful interference with the text, the editors still claimed to become second creators. This led to self-contradictions that have not been discussed within philology for a long time. Arnim’s poetical edition Goethe’s Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde makes this contradiction visible by exaggerating it: She pursues the hubris of being able to understand the author better than he understands himself in an excessive form. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Journal of literary theory; Berlin : De Gruyter; 16,2022,1, Seiten 77-95
    Weitere Schlagworte: Herausgeberschaft; Kollaborative Autorschaft; Edition; Briefwechsel; Praxeologie; Literatur (Belletristik) und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (19 Seiten)
  22. Die Kodierung von Emotionen in Texten Teil 1: Grundlagen
    Autor*in: Fries, Norbert
    Erschienen: 2008
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    Encoding Emotions in TextsThis is the first instalment of a two-part study that examines emotions from the perspective of linguistic semiotics. The underlying issue at stake is the relationship between linguistic forms and the meanings attached to... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    Encoding Emotions in TextsThis is the first instalment of a two-part study that examines emotions from the perspective of linguistic semiotics. The underlying issue at stake is the relationship between linguistic forms and the meanings attached to them. This part of the study lays the theoretical foundations for a consideration of the issues involved.In semantic terms, emotions can be explicated as predications: they assign to an experiencer the property of having particular subjective psychological experiences and forms of motor behaviour in certain situational conditions. When emotions are encoded linguistically, however, it is not necessary for each part of the predications involved to be lexically realized. In this respect, the linguistic meanings encoded in the lexical configuration of a language's grammatical and textual structures can be treated as underspecified. This allows us to analyse grammatical and textual structures as structures that are stringently compositional in nature, and to consider the meaning of linguistic signs and their expression on various levels. Meanings can be determined by lexical factors, grammatical factors, or factors relating to textual structure. In the case of both spoken and written utterances (that is, in conversations and texts), it is possible to convert such meanings into interpretations by making recourse to areas of knowledge other than that of grammar. These interpretations are tied to certain referents in a text or conversation.Emotional attitude (emotionale Einstellung) and emotional scene (emotionale Szene) are introduced as descriptive concepts for explicating emotions. They permit a more detailed understanding of the semantic and conceptual aspects that are relevant to the linguistic encoding of emotions. Emotional attitude is used to refer to the evaluative connection between a bearer of emotion and a relevant concept. Emotional attitudes can be formalized by means of three quantifying functions. These quantifying functions assign emotional values to emotional attitudes. The emotional scene serves as a descriptive tool for explicating clustered situational conditions of emotions. An emotional scene consists of the following descriptive features: experiencer, stimulus, emotional values, and judgements about the conditions for emotional evaluations. This last descriptive feature is a complex one and is formed using various predicates, including a set of basic predicates that are described in more detail and denote the qualities of internal states of living things that can be perceived through introspection. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Weitere Schlagworte: Literatur (Belletristik) und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (45 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
  23. Die Kodierung von Emotionen in Texten. Teil 2: Die Spezifizierung emotionaler Bedeutung in Texten
    Autor*in: Fries, Norbert
    Erschienen: 2009
    Verlag:  Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

    This study explicates emotions as specific meanings that are encoded by means of signs. Thus, emotions are the semiotically structured counterparts of inner feelings that can be perceived by means of introspection. In semantic terms, emotions can be... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    This study explicates emotions as specific meanings that are encoded by means of signs. Thus, emotions are the semiotically structured counterparts of inner feelings that can be perceived by means of introspection. In semantic terms, emotions can be treated as predications: they assign to the person that experiences a feeling the property of having particular subjective psychological experiences and employing particular forms of motor behaviour in certain situational conditions. The basic concepts needed for a semiotic, in particular linguistic and literary explication were set out in detail in the first part of the study. An experiencer is the semantic argument in a predication to which the psychological experience characterized by that predication is assigned. A stimulus is the semantic argument in a predication that is assigned by that predication the property of being the trigger or subject matter of the psychological experience in question. The descriptive concept of emotional attitudes is employed to explicate generalizable properties of clusters of subjective psychological experiences and motor behaviour. The concept of emotional scenes is used to provide a systematic representation of clustered situational conditions.After a brief overview of these theoretical foundations (section 1), the present, second part of the study focuses on how emotional meanings are specified in texts. The meanings encoded lexically and by means of grammatical and textual structures in a language are treated as underspecified, which means that linguistically encoded meanings are semantically and conceptually formed and specified in stages on a series of descriptive levels that build on one another. This involves interpretation routines that require information about, for example, lexical features, the formation of grammatical structures, orthographic and phonetic (rhythmic, prosodic) forms, the structuring of texts and conversations, non-linguistic forms of expression (such as facial expression and gestures or the formatting of a text), and the contexts of statements and their reception.This investigation is concerned primarily with the linguistic encoding of emotions, which is associated with the grammatical and transgrammatical descriptive levels. It provides a foundation for more far-reaching interpretations that employ the methods of literary and cultural studies in drawing on knowledge about cultural and historical factors and pre-texts. One of the main concerns of the article is therefore to consider the concept of underspecification and some of the factors that help to shape meanings (section 2). The focus of attention then shifts to the transgrammatical encoding and specification of emotional meanings (section 3). The possible ways of presenting linguistic signals and communicating information with them differ from one medium to the other: spoken language manifests itself as a continuum of sound that unfolds in time and is aurally perceived, whereas written language manifests itself in the form of discrete units that extend through space and are visually perceived. Many of the examples are drawn from Georg Büchner's Lenz, with attention being given to the circumstances of its production and reception; in an illustration of how an analysis can proceed, it is shown what the most important emotions in Lenz are and what narrative means are used to encode them. On the one hand, the emotions encoded by Büchner distinguish the text from the comments in Oberlin's diary, one of his historical sources. On the other hand, the techniques used to structure the text in this way mean that Lenz is comparable with modern transcriptions of exchanges between doctors and patients. Peer Reviewed

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Weitere Schlagworte: Literatur (Belletristik) und Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (53 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
  24. Journal of literary theory
    JLT ; new developments in literary theory and related disciplines
    Erschienen: 2007-
    Verlag:  de Gruyter, Berlin

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
    Signatur:
    HM 5: H 371
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007 - 16.2022
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universität Mainz, Bereichsbibliothek Philosophicum, Standort Anglistik/ Amerikanistik
    Signatur:
    L/Z J 7
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007,1
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    Zs 03127
    Bestandsinformationen
    1.2007,1
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch; Englisch
    Medientyp: Zeitschrift, Zeitung
    Format: Druck
    ISSN: 1862-5290
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800); Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturtheorie
    Umfang: 23 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Ersch. 2x jährl.